Evidence, chain of custody and bias
Adult · 35 minutes · Explain how forensic evidence stands or falls.
Answer by: Type. You can change method or take a break at any time.
Page 1 of 30
Our learning goal
Explain how forensic evidence stands or falls.
Your turn: Choose one thing you would like to understand by the end.
Offline speech needs an installed English device voice.
My lesson notes & project
Full teaching script
- Today: Evidence, chain of custody and bias. Our goal: Explain how forensic evidence stands or falls.
- Take one idea at a time. Pause after each sentence; ask for repetition whenever you need it.
- Locard's principle says every contact leaves a trace — but a trace only becomes evidence if its journey is unbroken. Chain of custody records who held the item, when, and in what sealed state; one gap and a court may exclude it. Interpretation carries risk too: contextual bias, where an examiner knows the suspect's identity, measurably shifts conclusions, so blind verification matters. Match probabilities are statements about coincidence, never about guilt — the prosecutor's fallacy inverts them and has convicted innocent people.
- Together: choose one example from the explanation and show how it works. What do you notice?
- Your turn: Write a chain-of-custody log for a single item from scene to court.
- Reflect: what made sense, and what would you like explained differently?
Watch and learn
Videos come only from approved education channels and need internet. Use the arrows in the player for more videos from the same channel.
